FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
This
is America. Don’t citizens have a right to smoke, even if it hurts them?
Can’t non-smokers just avoid places where colleagues
smoke?
Can’t non-smokers choose not to work in a smoky
environment?
Shouldn’t adults be permitted to smoke in bars?
Won’t
restaurants and bars lose business?
Don’t all workers deserve equal protection from toxic
secondhand smoke on the job?
This is America. Don’t citizens have a right to smoke, even if it hurts them?
Yes, smokers are free to continue to smoke—as long as
they don’t expose others involuntarily to cancer-causing chemicals.
American democracy has always created laws to protect society from threats
to our health and safety. Sometimes limits must be imposed on the right of
one individual to engage in behavior that, while acceptable if it affects
the individual only, is harmful to others.
Protecting people from exposure to
secondhand smoke is an example of society acting to safeguard citizens from
involuntary exposure to dangerous risk. When one person’s right to engage
in certain behavior conflicts with another person’s right not to be harmed,
limits have generally been placed on the harmful behavior.
Can’t
non-smokers just avoid places where colleagues smoke?
Suggesting that an employee can just walk away from
an area where someone is smoking is unfair and often unrealistic. Should
non-smokers be forced to restrict their activities (e.g., not eating lunch
in an employee cafeteria because people are smoking) in order to protect
their health? More importantly, in many workplaces it is physically
impossible to escape breathing toxic fumes from other people’s cigarettes.
Can’t
non-smokers choose not to work in a smoky environment?
It’s unfair to argue that someone should
find another job if he or she doesn’t want to be exposed to smoke in a
particular workplace. Jobs aren’t usually that easy to come by. In
addition, for many people – students supporting themselves through college,
single parents who need flexibility in their work schedules, performers who
need flexibility so they can go to auditions and study – restaurant and bar
work is often the most flexible and best-paying available. Unfortunately,
these workers are the least protected from exposure to secondhand smoke on
the job.
I
can understand banning smoking in restaurants, where food is served and children
are allowed, but why shouldn’t adults be permitted to smoke in bars?
Secondhand smoke is a lethal but
preventable occupational health hazard for the employees of bars,
restaurants, and other indoor places where smoking is now permitted. Working
an 8-hour shift, bartenders inhale carcinogens similar to smoking more than
half a pack of cigarettes. Exposure to secondhand smoke among food and
hospitality industry workers has increased rates of lung cancer, heart
disease, emphysema, asthma, respiratory disease, and many other ailments.
Can’t
we just improve air ventilation to reduce environmental tobacco smoke?
This alternative, supported by the tobacco industry
as a means of “accommodating” smokers and nonsmokers within the same space,
does not meet public health goals of protecting people from secondhand
smoke. Ventilation experts concur that even the newest technology does not
address the health concerns inherent in secondhand smoke and is an extremely
costly renovation to make. Many of the carcinogens and toxins inherent in
secondhand smoke are odorless and colorless, making it virtually impossible
to create a truly safe environment, despite its appearance.
Won’t
restaurants and bars lose business?
There is no evidence from any locations that have gone smoke-free that
restaurants and bars will lose money. In fact, studies suggest that
eliminating secondhand smoke has either a neutral or positive effect on
sales. By going smoke-free, businesses can save money due to reduced
absenteeism among non-smoking employees. Businesses can also benefit from
decreased insurance rates and maintenance costs.
Don’t
all workers deserve equal protection from toxic secondhand smoke on the job?
Yes!
|